Table of Contents
Respondents: Nexo AG; FINMA; U.S. SEC
Dossier: /case-2025-000001/
All posts: /tag/case-2025-000001/
Status: Open
Last updated: October 3, 2025
In 2021, I believed I had found a safe and flexible credit line against my crypto holdings through Nexo.
What I didn’t realize — and what no reasonable retirement-age investor could be expected to realize — was that I was entering a complex, high-risk margin account structure designed to maximize liquidation risk.
Despite presenting the product as a stable APR loan secured by collateral, Nexo operated a fully discretionary leverage engine:
- There were no protective guardrails against volatile market swings
- Loan-to-value (LTV) ratios were obscured and subject to change without notice
- Traditional risk mitigation tools like stop-loss mechanisms were unavailable
- Risk assessments were not conducted as required by regulators across jurisdictions
- Borrowers were not warned in advance of the systemic risk they were assuming
I lost over $3 million, including my entire retirement savings due to forced account liquidation.
This was not a business failure. It was a legal design failure. One that exploited asymmetry, jurisdictional fog, and procedural intimidation to avoid meaningful scrutiny.
As a retirement-age investor, I had no realistic chance to earn back what was lost. The product was irreparably unsuitable for my time horizon and risk profile — something any responsible financial institution would have evaluated.
This was not just bad luck. It was structural abuse.
And I am not the only one.
🧭 If you have experienced something similar, or have insight into systemic investor harm, please reach out via Content Integrity & Challenge Policy.