Skip to content

When Retirement Meets Leverage: The Nexo Trap - Case 2025-000001

A San Diego retiree lost over $3M in life savings after Nexo misrepresented a high-risk crypto margin account as a stable loan. A case study in investor harm and legal asymmetry.

Table of Contents

Case: 2025-000001
Respondents: Nexo AG; FINMA; U.S. SEC
Dossier: /case-2025-000001/
All posts: /tag/case-2025-000001/
Status: Open
Last updated: October 3, 2025

In 2021, I believed I had found a safe and flexible credit line against my crypto holdings through Nexo.

What I didn’t realize — and what no reasonable retirement-age investor could be expected to realize — was that I was entering a complex, high-risk margin account structure designed to maximize liquidation risk.

Despite presenting the product as a stable APR loan secured by collateral, Nexo operated a fully discretionary leverage engine:

  • There were no protective guardrails against volatile market swings
  • Loan-to-value (LTV) ratios were obscured and subject to change without notice
  • Traditional risk mitigation tools like stop-loss mechanisms were unavailable
  • Risk assessments were not conducted as required by regulators across jurisdictions
  • Borrowers were not warned in advance of the systemic risk they were assuming

I lost over $3 million, including my entire retirement savings due to forced account liquidation.

This was not a business failure. It was a legal design failure. One that exploited asymmetry, jurisdictional fog, and procedural intimidation to avoid meaningful scrutiny.

As a retirement-age investor, I had no realistic chance to earn back what was lost. The product was irreparably unsuitable for my time horizon and risk profile — something any responsible financial institution would have evaluated.

This was not just bad luck. It was structural abuse.

And I am not the only one.

🧭 If you have experienced something similar, or have insight into systemic investor harm, please reach out via Content Integrity & Challenge Policy.

Comments

Latest

Share your
story
Investor
Red Flag
Database

Disclaimer

The information presented on InvestorJustice.org is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or investment advice.

InvestorJustice.org is an independent public-interest research and education platform and does not offer individualized guidance, professional services, or endorsements.

Readers should consult qualified legal or financial professionals before making investment or regulatory decisions.

Our mission is transparency and accountability — not advocacy for any commercial entity.