Skip to content

Still Haunted: Nexo’s Legacy Victims Await SEC Follow-Through - Case 2025-000001

Nexo was fined $45 million by the SEC for its illegal Earn Interest Product—but many retirement-age investors remain financially ruined, with no recourse. This article calls for overdue cross-border enforcement.

Table of Contents

Case: 2025-000001
Respondents: Nexo AG; FINMA; U.S. SEC
Dossier: /case-2025-000001/
All posts: /tag/case-2025-000001/
Status: Open
Last updated: October 3, 2025

In 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission fined crypto lender Nexo $45 million for its unlawful Earn Interest Product (EIP), a move that brought temporary closure, but not justice, for many investors.

As of today, legacy users, especially those of retirement age, are still suffering the consequences of inadequate cross-border enforcement. I am one of them.


The Cross-Border Framework That Failed Us

The SEC and Switzerland’s FINMA maintain a bilateral Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), affirming both agencies’ commitment to investor protection and regulatory cooperation. This agreement enabled information sharing and coordinated enforcement, but it failed in practice when it mattered most.

While Nexo operated globally under the credibility of Swiss regulation, FINMA failed to intervene. Nexo structured itself behind a Cayman Islands entity while maintaining operations in Zug, Switzerland—avoiding meaningful oversight from either jurisdiction.

When the SEC finally acted in 2023, harm had already occurred.


What the SEC Got Right—and Missed

The SEC’s cease-and-desist order targeted the Earn Interest Product (EIP), acknowledging it as an unregistered security. But many of us suffered losses under other Nexo offerings, such as its so-called “Credit Line”, which were not covered by the ruling.

I lost my life savings. At 65, I now face bankruptcy, with no meaningful path to restitution. The silence from both regulators is deafening.


The SEC–FINMA MOU: A Broken Promise?

The MOU still stands. But what is a bilateral commitment worth if it doesn't protect real investors?

I have supplied FINMA with legal counsel, documentation, and a clear path to resolution. Still, no action. I am asking the SEC to re-engage, not by relitigating, but by:

  • Demanding Nexo settle with legacy victims
  • Invoking the FINMA MOU to apply bilateral pressure
  • Reaffirming that delay and foreign silence do not excuse inaction

A Second Act for the SEC

The SEC has already demonstrated it can hold Nexo accountable. Now it must finish the job—because legacy harm is still within its jurisdiction and mandate.

I am not seeking a windfall. I am trying to avoid dying bankrupt. This is a test of regulatory follow-through—and a warning that cross-border oversight means little if it abandons those harmed the most.

Comments

Latest

Share your
story
Investor
Red Flag
Database

Disclaimer

The information presented on InvestorJustice.org is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or investment advice.

InvestorJustice.org is an independent public-interest research and education platform and does not offer individualized guidance, professional services, or endorsements.

Readers should consult qualified legal or financial professionals before making investment or regulatory decisions.

Our mission is transparency and accountability — not advocacy for any commercial entity.