Legal Primer: Removing “APR” Does Not Make It Legal
Removing “APR” from a credit product does not make it legal. Under U.S., Swiss, EU, and Cayman law, illegality is determined when the offer was made, not when misleading language is deleted.
APR
InvestorJustice Advisory: Why Investors Should Avoid Nexo
InvestorJustice.org warns investors to avoid Nexo. Evidence shows misuse of APR, refusal of lawful records requests, jurisdictional evasion, and deletion of key Terms of Service clauses, leaving investors, especially seniors, without accountability.
![[PDF] Evidentiary Brief – Illegality of APR with Liquidation - Case 2025-000001](https://cdn.mymidnight.blog/14d9e8007c9b41f57891c48e07c23f57/2025/10/IMG_5212-1.png)
[PDF] Evidentiary Brief – Illegality of APR with Liquidation - Case 2025-000001
This evidentiary brief outlines cross-jurisdictional violations by Nexo AG, where APR-marketed loans were actually high-risk margin accounts. It includes legal precedent, investor harm, and forensic evidence calling for regulatory intervention.
![[PDF] DFPI APR Misrepresentation - Case 2025-000001](https://cdn.mymidnight.blog/14d9e8007c9b41f57891c48e07c23f57/2025/10/IMG_5212-2.png)
[PDF] DFPI APR Misrepresentation - Case 2025-000001
Outlines how Nexo’s language misled users by describing a margin-based product as a “fixed APR credit line.” Supports misrepresentation and consumer protection claims under Swiss and U.S. law.
![[PDF] DFPI APR Evidence - Case 2025-000001](https://cdn.mymidnight.blog/14d9e8007c9b41f57891c48e07c23f57/2025/10/IMG_5212-4.png)
[PDF] DFPI APR Evidence - Case 2025-000001
Documents forensic screenshot evidence showing Nexo’s misrepresentation of APR-based lending while hiding margin liquidation risks. Demonstrates consumer deception with timestamped, hash-verified evidence, extremely valuable for journalists, regulators, and potential co-claimants.