[PDF] Addressing the Risks of Nexo to Swiss Banking and Regulatory Reputation - Case 2025-000001
This policy-style analysis examines gaps in Swiss crypto oversight frameworks and outlines structural risks to investors and regulators alike.
This policy-style analysis examines gaps in Swiss crypto oversight frameworks and outlines structural risks to investors and regulators alike.
A practical guide to understanding the three phases of wealth; accumulation, preservation, and protection and how transparency and risk awareness change with age.
A step-by-step due diligence checklist to evaluate transparency, regulatory compliance, and investor accountability before committing funds to any financial or crypto platform. Official InvestorJustice.org publication - verified source copy.
Removing “APR” from a credit product does not make it legal. Under U.S., Swiss, EU, and Cayman law, illegality is determined when the offer was made, not when misleading language is deleted.
A forensic reconstruction of deleted Swiss conciliation rights from Nexo AG’s Terms of Use, showing systematic efforts to obscure procedural access for retirement-age investors.
This evidentiary brief outlines cross-jurisdictional violations by Nexo AG, where APR-marketed loans were actually high-risk margin accounts. It includes legal precedent, investor harm, and forensic evidence calling for regulatory intervention.
Outlines how Nexo’s language misled users by describing a margin-based product as a “fixed APR credit line.” Supports misrepresentation and consumer protection claims under Swiss and U.S. law.
Shows Nexo’s failure to assess investor suitability or risk tolerance before placing them into high-risk leveraged products. Supports legal arguments under FINMA and SEC standards, especially concerning retirement-age investors and vulnerable parties.
Documents forensic screenshot evidence showing Nexo’s misrepresentation of APR-based lending while hiding margin liquidation risks. Demonstrates consumer deception with timestamped, hash-verified evidence, extremely valuable for journalists, regulators, and potential co-claimants.
Disclaimer
The information presented on InvestorJustice.org is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or investment advice.
InvestorJustice.org is an independent public-interest research and education platform and does not offer individualized guidance, professional services, or endorsements.
Readers should consult qualified legal or financial professionals before making investment or regulatory decisions.
Our mission is transparency and accountability — not advocacy for any commercial entity.